🔗 Share this article

Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an adorable small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but very loyal friend. Another whale, Zephyr has “ants in his pants” and wiggles like a worm. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.

A group of thirty enclosed marine mammals in a Canada-based entertainment facility have become pawns in a disagreement between a shuttered park, local and national governments and animal rights activists.

But those most familiar with the whales say the impassioned debate over their fate often fails to consider the complexities of the whales who, after spending their lives in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the national authorities disallowed the sale of the belugas to China, the controversial facility near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to end their lives unless the government covers the cost of their care. The nation’s fisheries minister has rejected that ultimatum, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain situation.

Intelligent Sea Creatures

Experts say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their vocal imitation skills, problem solving and communal behavior suggest they are highly cognitive mammals – something Kristy Burgess discovered directly.

Burgess spent three years as a whale caretaker, a job that entailed building relationships of the sea creatures.

“Building up those connections over time takes a lot of regularity and a lot of affection. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “In time, you gain mutual trust. And they start being more open with you. It’s just so extraordinary and rewarding.”

The trainer knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so astounded by the details and unique traits in their personalities. She cultivated a deep bond for Eve and Cleopatra with different temperaments.

“One whale selected me. The other demanded work,” she said. “Each changed the way I perceive connection.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Her interaction with the whales developed against a background of rising activist criticism to their captivity.

During her time at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, Kiska, passed away. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a number which the park attributes to expected lifespan, but which campaigners say indicates the substandard environment in which they were housed.

The park did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes effects of the shutdown. “Concrete is breaking off from the enclosures because they’re falling apart and not being fixed. The whales are inquisitive and so they take pieces and navigate with chunks in their mouth. It’s distressing to see.”

The facility did not comment to a inquiry, but in the past asserted: “The whales … obtain far superior medical attention and constant supervision than any person in the Britain, or elsewhere.”

Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions

Burgess was dismissed from the facility in early March following the demise of Eos, an unwell beluga the park staff had to euthanize. She said the park suspected details of the death were disclosed to the press and she was released shortly thereafter.

The ambiguity over the whales’ outcome has left her and current and former trainers in despair. She says the park’s warning to euthanize its whales is a negotiation tactic and is a “practically unfeasible” task, adding any attempts to euthanize even a single beluga would require “significant staff”, vehicles and heavy equipment.

“It’s impossible in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.

She advocates for demands for the whales to be taken promptly from the park, with its deteriorating pools and shrinking team.

In the autumn, Canada’s government official turned down a bid to send the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the proposal would have meant a continued existence in enclosure and a reversion to display for amusement,” the official stated. “As the public, we know that whales belong in the sea, not in enclosures for our entertainment. I could not in ethical standing authorize an transfer that would prolong the situation these belugas have suffered.”

But Burgess said the official’s statements reflect a broader misunderstanding of the realities of existence for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The society needs to realize these are whales that have existed solely in confinement and they will need human care for the foreseeable future,” she said. “People just don’t comprehend that it’s not as straightforward as saying ‘close it down’.”

Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate

As authorities struggle to find a answer, suggestions have emerged, some of which have little basis in reality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a key source of food for local populations.

A suggested refuge in the region of eastern Canada, which recently received government approval, has shown to be contentious. The prospective facility, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Advocates remain hopeful that it could ultimately represent a sustainable solution for a number of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “doubts there” about what she said is “merely an untested concept” in the whales’ well-being.

Some experts say the possibility of a sanctuary represents a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a feasible approach in the short term.

An official, leader of the sanctuary project, said the site will simulate the mental engagement and nutrition the whales obtain from trainers, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|